|
A.I.
- Artificial Intelligence
Here's
a cinematic stumper: what if a Stanley Kubrick film and a Steven
Spielberg film mated and produced offspring? Could it survive? Would
audiences embrace a colder, darker Spielberg or a warmer, friendlier
Kubrick? This summer provides the answer. The offspring would be A.I.:
Artificial Intelligence - a film that thrives for two hours before
dying painful death in the last forty minutes.
What
can you say about a film with such a high purpose and noble
intentions when it self-destructs so obviously and frustratingly
in front of you? The acting is top notch, the special effects
are amazing, as are the sets, cinematography and art direction.
This is not a lazy film - it's a film that tries to be too much
to too many.
A.I.
opens years in the future after the polar ice caps have melted,
and natural resources are scarce. Mechas, or androids, are particularly
useful as they never need food or rest. They have become the
working underclass of the future. As well, most couples are
never allowed to have children because society cannot support
more humans. One Cybertronics Inc. professor sees the potential
market in this, and pitches his latest idea to a roomful of
colleagues - a robotic child programmed to love.
The
prototype, David (Haley Joel Osment), is sent to live
with Henry Swinton (Sam Robards), a Cybertronics employee.
He and his wife Monica (Frances O'Connor) are mourning
the loss of their son, who is being kept in a cryogenic coma
in the unlikely event that his fatal disease can be cured. Monica
is horrified by David at first, and rejects the idea of replacing
her beloved son with a mecha. It seems unlikely that she will
activate the irreversible protocol that will bind David to her
forever with artificial love.
Of
course she will, and it is this part of the film that is truly
engrossing. Haley Joel Osment is outstanding in his ability
to make David cold, yet endearing as the pre-love robot boy.
Once he becomes a real "son", Osment's face becomes
a canvas for joy, confusion, and concern. He not only brings
David to life, but the whole film as well.
The
inevitable return of the Swinton's son Martin begins the fall
of David from their good graces. He can't compete with a real
boy, and once he hears Monica read the story of Pinocchio, David
becomes obsessed with the idea of becoming "real"
and winning his mother's love forever. Despite the warnings
of his robotic toy bear, Teddy, David is talked into several
dangerous stunts by the jealous Martin, and is deemed a threat
to the family. Knowing that he will be destroyed if he is returned
to Cybertronics, Monica abandons a devastated David with Teddy
in the woods.
At
this point, A.I. switches gears completely and becomes
a darker film. David meets love mecha Gigolo Joe (Jude Law)
and learns the hazards of "Flesh Fairs" - festivals
where humans gather to gleefully destroy robots. Joe understands
and accepts his place in the human world, and finds David's
desire to be real hard to fathom. Their journey takes them to
the sex themed Rouge City and finally to the partially drowned
Manhattan in search of Pinocchio's Blue Fairy - the only person
who can turn David into a real boy.
These
first two hours are beautiful, if not always gripping, cinema.
The first hour is pure Spielberg, which is to say it pulses
with the frailty and mystery of the family dynamic. David watches
Monica adoringly; capturing every moment with her, fretting
that the fifty years she promises to be with him is too short.
What Spielberg understands is that childhood does last forever,
at least in some part of our hearts and minds. As we mature,
we learn to let go. David never will.
Hour
two is Kubrick filtered through Spielberg, and it doesn't quite
work, but it's fun to watch nonetheless. It's bleak-lite. Whenever
things get too horrific, the mood is lightened. The presence
of Teddy, with his oddly comforting monotone voice insures that
neither David nor the audience will be left alone in the dark.
In
the last forty minutes, A.I. spins out of control. It's
pointless exposition that weakens everything that has passed
before it. Perhaps Spielberg did not trust the audience to "get
it", which is a shame. Without these bizarre scenes, A.I.
would have been a more poignant, thought-provoking film.
A.I.
is disappointing for the chances it did not take - for the stories
it did not tell. You want to spend more time with each character,
each environment, learning more. This could have been a wonderful
family film or it could have been a violent, disturbing portrait
of the future, but it can't be both. Ultimately, it is worth
a visit for the excellent acting and spectacular visuals, but
it will most likely be a letdown for hard-core fans of either
Kubrick or Spielberg.
|